George J. Stigler

George Stigler graduated with a B.A. from Washington University in 1931 obtained his M.B.A. from Northwestern the following year. The climax of his studies were at the University of Chicago, where he obtained his Ph.D and initiated an extremely successful academic career. He taught at Iowa State College, Minnesota, and spent a year at Brown, while working the duration of WWII doing statistical research at Columbia University.

His early career interests included price theory, linear programming, vertical integration, delivered price systems, and more. He was also on Staff at the National Bureau of Economic Research, where he studied the service industries and the behavior of industrial prices. Although, arguably his most notable field of study was public regulation. He concluded that public regulation has little influence and is usually detrimental to consumer interests. He is also known for developing his Theory of Economic Regulation (sometimes called Stigler's theory). He wrote a theoretical article in 1971 that changed the way economists analyze government regulation, and all throughout his career and in all of his works he constantly stressed the importance of information over broader theories and ideas.

I did not know of George Stigler's exact role in economic history, although Stigler's theory seemed vaguely familiar as I was doing research. I believe his work is important because there are a lot of possibilities and conclusions to be made analyzing data and information rather than broader discussions and theories. Reading about his work in public regulation was also interesting, specifically focusing on the harmful effect of regulation on consumers.

Comments

  1. Professor ArvanSeptember 6, 2019 at 1:30 PM

    I believe that George Stigler is considered the father of "information economics" which we will be quite concerned with in our course. He set the path for future economic research with his paper, The Economics of Information (1961).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Team Structure

I have been in groups and teams that have been mildly successful, and some that have not been. By far, the most successful team that I was a part of was my high school Water Polo team, specifically my Junior and Senior year (2015 and 2016). What made the success even more meaningful was a period of under-performance during my Sophomore year, when we failed to reach the Sectional Final for the first time in a while (not sure on the exact year, must have been since at least 2008). For the next two, quite successful years, we had some added motivation due to previous “failure”. In 2015 we won the Sectional Championship against our rival school (who we had lost to three times earlier in the year). In 2016 we finished 3 rd in the state which at the time was the highest finish in school history. What I enjoyed about the structure of our team, specifically my senior year in 2016, was that we didn’t really have a single standout player or two, rather a larger group of good players to wo
Read more

Discipline and Punishment Severity

It may be true that “draconian” punishments harden an individual. Those kinds of punishments, in most cases, tend to make the individual more severe and less sympathetic afterwards. When I think of these kinds of punishments, I immediately think of sports coaches. In that context, they have the goal of strengthening individuals, more so mentally than physically, and they (the coaches) gain from having the individuals (the players) having less sympathy as it helps them reach their objective – winning the game/contest/whatever they’re competing in. But in most contexts (work, group activities, etc), especially if the main goal is to strengthen the relationship and increase productivity, harsh punishments may not be the way to go. I’m thinking that draconian punishments are more of a short-term band aid to increase imminent production, but long-term it probably does more harm than help in terms of strengthening relationships and building mutual productivity and respect. I think that p
Read more

Illinibucks

This is an interesting hypothetical to analyze. One of the first questions I had reading this prompt was ‘would all students receive the same allocation of Illinibucks’? If so, then this puts everyone at a level playing field, and it is up to the students to effectively use their allocation, as everyone has the same amount and people can’t just overpay (if they had more than others) even if they don’t value it at that price. The administered prices would have to be high enough so everyone can’t buy everything so easily. Some of the things that the Illinibuck system could work for would be class registration, advisor meetings, housing selection, and others. Using a single “currency” system for these different factors would force students to prioritize these. They may value housing more than course selection, or vice-versa. This would only work if these things had the same administered price. If a student is forced to choose between having first selection of a class or a dorm at a simi
Read more